Moderation using Blackboard Ultra
Moderation ensures fair, consistent marking through internal review, sampling, and oversight by External Examiners before exam board validation. This page gives a brief overview of how Blackboard can be used for moderation processes in Ulster University. The methods and tools outlined will help staff remain compliant with the moderation practices detailed in the Assessment Code of Practice (as defined below).
The Gradebook in Blackboard Ultra provides a centralised location to view and manage all grades, including any overridden marks. Where work is not electronically submitted, grades and feedback should still be recorded and can be made available to students via a manually-created Gradebook item or an offline submission assignment in Gradebook.
The Assessment Code of Practice covers many forms of moderation, once you are clear on the methods you need to use, you will find some suggested workflows for these in Blackboard Ultra.
You are welcome to contact CDLE, or book a one to one, to discuss what would work best for your particular needs.
Moderation practices | Suggested workflows |
|---|---|
Dual marking: | Access Gradebook > Markable items, click on name of assignment, view submissions, mark in usual way:
Marking and feedback in Blackboard assignments See Mark using rubric in Blackboard
Marking and feedback of Turnitin assignments In Turnitin both markers can use single overall comments and rubric (if used). |
Sampling: | Access Gradebook > Markable items, click on name of assignment, view submissions and view as instructed. When sampling the moderator will just view and has no need to amend or add comments. To facilitate this process, you can set up a ‘Sampling groups’ in Groups, for each coursework component. The moderator can then use the filter functionality in the Gradebook > Marks view to see only the assignments belonging to the sample group which need moderated. |
Double marking: | Students should never see two sets of grades and feedback. Provide feedback to students through the designated feedback area, this could include written comments, rubric feedback, and/or attached files.
Parallel marking/ 2 markers per student setting in Blackboard assignments only. This could also be used to filter views of students to mark/second mark (be aware of limitations -can’t be used with groups or Turnitin functionality) Alternative workflow (contact CDLE for advice)Set up two dropboxes for the course submission (a main assignment dropbox – can be BB Assignment or Turnitin) for students to submit into and a hidden ‘Offline submission’ dropbox . Ask all Assessor 1 staff to mark and add feedback in the main dropbox, Assessor 2 markers should go into the hidden dropbox to add their marks and feedback. The Assessors meet and agree a mark and they (or the Module Coordinator) incorporate both and incorporate all feedback and grades to release to students in the main assignment dropbox. |
Double blind marking: | Alternative workflows (contact CDLE for advice)
|
Arbitration: Individual cases where the marker and moderator are unable to agree a mark, the Course Director will identify an arbiter who will determine the mark and feedback recorded. In this case, the feedback sheet will include the arbiter’s name.
| To add notes or feedback to a student’s submission (that students cannot see):
|
Related articles
Useful links
Centre for Digital Learning Enhancement
ulster.ac.uk/learningengancement/cdle
